Ohio State
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
158  Christine Frederick SR 20:09
189  Emily Stoodley JR 20:14
254  Sarah Kanney JR 20:24
298  Lainey Studebaker SO 20:31
316  Abby Nichols SO 20:33
412  Caroline Millican FR 20:43
466  Kalee Soehnlen FR 20:47
487  Lilly Saniel-Banrey JR 20:49
521  Jessica Passwater JR 20:52
636  Brittany Atkinson JR 21:03
National Rank #35 of 348
Great Lakes Region Rank #6 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 52.1%
Most Likely Finish 30th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.7%
Top 20 at Nationals 9.9%


Regional Champion 1.8%
Top 5 in Regional 55.1%
Top 10 in Regional 99.6%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Christine Frederick Emily Stoodley Sarah Kanney Lainey Studebaker Abby Nichols Caroline Millican Kalee Soehnlen Lilly Saniel-Banrey Jessica Passwater Brittany Atkinson
Commodore Classic 09/16 722 20:39 20:41 20:25 20:07 20:29 20:36 21:49 20:58 20:45 21:01
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/29 700 20:28 20:21 20:25 20:23 20:30 20:40 21:23 20:58 21:08
Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/14 20:58 21:31
Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/14 690 20:07 20:06 20:33 20:50 20:36 20:41 20:42
Big Ten Championship 10/29 606 19:46 20:06 20:28 20:36 20:29 21:03 20:44 20:38 20:51
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/10 618 19:52 20:12 20:25 20:43 20:31 20:32 20:59





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 52.1% 25.2 605 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.3 2.0 2.5 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.5 3.2 3.2 5.3 6.1 6.6 6.0
Region Championship 100% 5.3 173 1.8 3.7 8.4 18.5 22.8 20.8 14.5 6.2 2.0 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Christine Frederick 55.8% 123.8 0.1 0.1
Emily Stoodley 53.1% 132.8
Sarah Kanney 52.2% 162.1
Lainey Studebaker 52.1% 180.9
Abby Nichols 52.2% 181.8
Caroline Millican 52.1% 204.1
Kalee Soehnlen 52.1% 213.3


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Christine Frederick 21.2 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.1 2.5 2.1 2.6 2.8 2.5 3.2 3.1 2.9 3.7 3.7 3.3 3.8 4.4 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.1 3.9
Emily Stoodley 25.5 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.6 1.2 1.0 0.9 1.3 0.9 1.6 1.8 1.7 2.8 2.6 2.0 3.4 2.6 3.2 3.5 2.7 3.7 3.4 3.2 3.2
Sarah Kanney 36.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.4 1.2 0.8 0.8 1.3 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.9 2.1 1.8 2.1 1.9
Lainey Studebaker 43.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.3 1.1 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.6
Abby Nichols 45.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0
Caroline Millican 57.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3
Kalee Soehnlen 62.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1.8% 100.0% 1.8 1.8 1
2 3.7% 100.0% 3.7 3.7 2
3 8.4% 89.3% 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.9 7.5 3
4 18.5% 78.6% 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.5 2.3 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.5 4.0 14.5 4
5 22.8% 63.2% 0.3 0.4 1.3 2.1 2.2 2.6 1.6 2.0 2.0 8.4 14.4 5
6 20.8% 36.3% 0.1 0.4 1.5 1.2 1.3 1.1 2.1 13.3 7.6 6
7 14.5% 18.3% 0.2 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 11.8 2.7 7
8 6.2% 6.2 8
9 2.0% 2.0 9
10 1.1% 1.1 10
11 0.3% 0.3 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 52.1% 1.8 3.7 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.9 1.9 3.3 4.6 4.9 5.6 6.5 5.7 5.7 6.2 48.0 5.5 46.6




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 58.3% 2.0 1.2
Eastern Michigan 29.6% 2.0 0.6
SMU 20.8% 1.0 0.2
Baylor 17.5% 1.0 0.2
Missouri 5.0% 2.0 0.1
Duke 4.9% 1.0 0.0
Florida State 4.9% 1.0 0.0
Arizona 2.8% 1.0 0.0
Wake Forest 2.5% 1.0 0.0
Abilene Christian 1.6% 1.0 0.0
Alabama 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Northwestern 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Portland 0.6% 1.0 0.0
Vanderbilt 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Notre Dame 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Brown 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Pittsburgh 0.2% 2.0 0.0
Arizona State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Dayton 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 2.4
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 7.0